VDMTC

is a joint project by

University of Nebraska Medical Center logo

Pennsylvania State University logo

TATRC logo 

 

Virtual Disaster Medicine

Training Center (VDMTC)

Module 12

The American Society of Anesthesiologists' Management

of the Difficult Airway Algorithm and Explanation-Analysis of the Algorithm

Problems with the ASA Algorithm and Likely Future Directions

 

 

DEFINITION OF OPTIMAL-BEST ATTEMPT AT CONVENTIONAL LARYNGOSCOPY

 

Difficulty in performing endotracheal intubation is the end result of difficulty in performing laryngoscopy, which depends on the operator’s level of expertise, patient characteristics, and circumstances.  The problem with multiple repeated attempts at conventional laryngoscopy is the creation of laryngeal edema and bleeding, which will impair mask ventilation and subsequent endotracheal intubation attempts, thereby creating a CICV situation.  Thus, it is imperative that the anesthesiologist makes his/her optimal-best attempt at laryngoscopy as early as possible, and, if that fails, an alternative plan should be activated so that no further risk, without likely benefit, will be incurred.

What is an optimal-best attempt at conventional laryngoscopy?8  First, a reasonably experienced anesthesiologist who has had at least 3 full years of experience, should perform the laryngoscopy.  If an experienced anesthesiologist is having difficult visualizing the glottis, he/she should not ask or allow other anesthesiologists or ENT surgeons to attempt the same maneuver.

 

Second, the patient should always be in an optimal “sniffing” position (slight flexion of the neck on the head and severe extension of the head on the neck),8 which aligns the oral, pharyngeal, and laryngeal axis into more of a straight line. In some patients (such as the obese) obtaining an optimal “sniffing” position takes a great deal of work (Fig. 4), such as placing pillows and blankets under the scapula, shoulders, nape of the neck, and head, which is difficult when anesthesia and paralysis have made the patient a massive (dead) weight.  Positioning the obese patient can be easily accomplished with a new positioning device, the Troop Elevation Pillow (Mercury Medical, Clearwater, FL) (Figure 5).  Thus, an endotracheal intubation attempt should not be wasted because of failure to have the patient in an optimal “sniffing” position prior to the induction of general anesthesia.

 

Third, if the laryngoscopic grade is either II (arytenoids only), III (epiglottis only), or IV (soft palate only), then optimal external laryngeal manipulation (OELM) or backwards, upwards, rightward pressure (BURP) should be used (Fig. 6).6,8  Neither OELM nor BURP is cricoid pressure (Fig. 6) and can be achieved in 5-10secs.6  Such maneuvers very frequently can improve the laryngoscopic view by at least one entire grade and should be an inherent part of laryngoscopy and an instinctive reflex response to a poor laryngoscopic view.6  Thus, an endotracheal intubation attempt should not be wasted because of failure to use these maneuvers.

Fourth, the proper function of both a Macintosh and Miller blade is dependent on using an appropriate length of blade. In order to life the epiglottis out of the line of sight, the Macintosh blade must be long enough to put tension on the glossoepiglottic ligament, and the Miller blade must be long enough to trap the epiglottis against the tongue. Thus, in some patients, it may be appropriate to change the length of the blade one time in order to obtain proper blade function.

 

Fifth, in some patients, a Macintosh blade may provide a superior view or intubating conditions than a Miller blade, and vice versa. A Macintosh blade is generally regarded as a better blade whenever there is little upper airway room to pass the ET (e.g., small narrow mouth, palate, oropharynx), and a Miller blade is generally regarded as a better blade in patients who have a small mandibular space (anterior larynx), large incisors, or a long, floppy epiglottis.

 

In summary, an optimal-best attempt at laryngoscopy can be defined as: (1) a reasonably experienced (at least 3 full recent years) laryngoscopist; (2) use of optimal “sniffing” position; (3) use of OLEM or BURP; (4) change of length or type of blade one time.  With this definition, and with no other confounding considerations, optimal-best attempt at laryngoscopy may be achieved on the first attempt and should not take more than a maximum of 3 attempts.  Thus, difficult endotracheal intubation may be readily apparent to a reasonably experienced intubationist on the very first attempt and therefore be both number of attempts and time independent.  A more logical definition would be based on optimal-best attempt laryngoscopic view and periglottic and subglottic pathology and retain number of attempts and time of attempt as maximal boundary airway conditions.

 

 

go to page      previous    1  2  3  4  5    next

 

first draft:  30 Mar 2006

content last updated:  30 Mar 2006

 

previous section                                           next section

 

 

Sections:

 

Introduction

The ASA Algorithm on the Management of the Difficult Airway

Summary of the ASA Algorithm

Problems with the ASA Algorithm and Likely Future Directions

Conclusion

Bibliography

 

Module 12 Home

VDMTC home

(module list)

Glossary