Module 12
The American Society of Anesthesiologists'
Management
of the Difficult Airway Algorithm
and Explanation-Analysis of the Algorithm
The ASA Algorithm on the
Management of the Difficult Airway
THE ANESTHETIZED PATIENT WHOSE TRACHEA
IS DIFFICULT TO INTUBATE
There are three general situations in
which an anesthesiologist will be required to intubate the
trachea of an unconscious or anesthetized patient whose airway
is difficult to manage. First, the patient may already be
unconscious (e.g., posttrauma) or anesthetized (e.g., drug
overdose). Second, the patient may absolutely refuse or
not tolerate awake intubation (e.g., a child, a mentally
retarded patient, or an intoxicated combative patient
[see dashed line, Fig. 3]). Third, and perhaps most
commonly, the anesthesiologist may
fail to recognize intubation
difficulty on the preoperative evaluation. Of course, even
in the first and second situations above, the preoperative
airway evaluation is very important because the findings may
dictate the choice of intubation technique. In all three
of the situations above, the patient may, in addition, have a
full stomach.
All of the intubation techniques that are
described for the awake patient2,10
can be used in the unconscious or anesthetized patient without
modification. However, direct and fiberoptic laryngoscopy
may be slightly more difficult in the paralyzed, anesthetized
patient compared to the awake patient because the larynx may
become more anterior relative to other structures due to
relaxation of oral and pharyngeal muscles.49
In addition, and more importantly, the upper airway structures
may coalesce into a horizontal plane instead of separating out
in a vertical plane.29,48
In the anesthetized patient whose trachea
has proven to be difficult to intubate, it is necessary to try
to maintain gas exchange between intubation attempts by mask
ventilation and also during intubation attempts, whenever
possible. As depicted in the latest version of the
Difficult Airway Management Algorithm, opportunities to deliver
supplemental oxygen throughout whatever steps are taken to
secure the airway, should be pursued.47
Positive pressure ventilation may be continuously maintained
during fiberoptic endoscopy-aided orotracheal intubation by
using an anesthesia mask that has a special fiberoptic
instrument port, which is covered by a self-sealing diaphragm
(instead of standard mask) along with an airway intubator
(instead of the standard oropharyngeal airway)
(see Chapter 18)45,48
or by using an LMA as a conduit for the FOB
(see Chapter 21).9
It is extremely important to realize that
the amount of laryngeal edema and bleeding will very likely
increase after every forceful intubation attempt. Although
laryngeal edema and bleeding can occur with any intubation
method, it is most common after use of a laryngoscope or
retraction blade. Consequently, if there does not appear
to be anything really new or different that can be
atraumatically and quickly tried (better sniffing position,
external laryngeal manipulation, new blade, new technique, much
more experienced laryngoscopist, etc.) after a few failed
intubation attempts, and ventilation by mask can still be
maintained, it is prudent to cease intubation attempts, and
consider the following options:1) awaken the patient, 2)
continue anesthesia via mask or LMA ventilation, or 3) perform a
tracheostomy or cricothyrotomy before the ability to ventilate
the lungs via mask is lost (Figs. 1a and 1b). In fact, the
most common scenario in the respiratory catastrophes in the ASA
closed-claims study was the development of progressive
difficulty in ventilating via mask between persistent and
prolonged failed intubation attempts; the final result was
inability to ventilate via mask and provide gas exchange
(see Chapter 53).19
If the surgical procedure is not urgent, awakening the patient
and doing the procedure another day will allow for better
planning. On the other hand, “awakening the patient” is
often not possible in a failed airway situation, especially if
the intubation is emergent. Many cases may be done (and may
have to be done) via mask or LMA ventilation (e.g., cesarean
section) if ventilation is reasonably easy. Finally, in
some cases, the airway will have to be secured by a tracheostomy
or cricothyrotomy (e.g., thoracotomy, intracranial-head-neck
cases, and cases in the prone position).
If regurgitation or vomiting occurs at any time during attempts
at endotracheal intubation in an anesthetized patient, there are
a number of therapeutic steps that should be taken. First,
the patient should be put in the Trendelenburg position, and the
head, and perhaps the body, turned to the left. Second,
the mouth and pharynx should be suctioned with a large bore
suction device. Endotracheal intubation may then be tried
with the patient in the lateral position; the advantage of this
maneuver is that the tongue may be more out of the way, but the
disadvantage is that this intubation position may be unfamiliar
to most anesthesiologists. If the ET has been passed into
the esophagus, it may be left there; the advantage is that the
ET may decompress the stomach and perhaps guide (by negative
example) future intubation attempts. However, the
disadvantage is that it may be more difficult to obtain a
satisfactory mask seal between intubation attempts, even if the
esophageal ET is sharply bent off to the side by the rim of the
mask. Once the airway is secured and aspiration of gastric
contents has been performed, standard treatment consists of
suctioning, mechanical ventilation, positive end-expiratory
pressure, fiberoptically guided saline lavage, and perhaps
steroids and appropriate antibiotics after specific cultures and
sensitivities are available
(see Chapter 32).
go to page
previous
1
2
3
4
5
6
next
|